Ray Kurzweil, a reference when it comes to singularity, in his TED talk in 2009 explained that technology is under an exponential growth, our mind fails to imagine what the future will be because we just aren’t capable to imagine in an equally exponential way. Tools like Future Forecasting and it’s methods become then extremely important when it comes to understanding the future.
Another one of the references in my research about Singularity was Ridley Scott’s master piece: “Blade Runner”. This movie was inspired in the book “Do androids dream of electric sheep” from Philip K. Dick and first published in 1968.
In the book androids are described to be perfect humans when it comes to the appearance, but they are not capable of empathy. So, to distinguish humans from androids, they apply a test called the Voigt-Kampff . This test can reveal the androids by measuring empathetic responses to questions designed to evoke an emotional response, often including animal subjects and themes.
In the book androids with artificial intelligence where not able to have empathy, so I wondered if that would also happen in our future. On an interview recorded on July the 13th of 2009 Kurzweil was asked about the ability for the machines to be self-aware and conscient. Kurzweil defended the importance of a model of conscience in the robots since our moral and legal system depends on these concepts. But it was also made clear by him that we don’t know how these models can be built. Some models of self representation can be explained by hierarchical thinking processed in our brain’s cortex and this can be proved by scientists, but some feelings like happiness, join and humor are very hard to describe and aren’t, in Kurzweil’s opinion, a scientifical issue since they are connected to subjective experience. While science is based on objective observations, subjective experience is connected to philosophy and there, there can be so many models as philosophers.
Will robots be able to process a situation and come up with a completely original thought? Even if they don’t, they can probably come up very close in fooling us due to the highly precise programing. It’s the same question raised by Raymond Kurzweil when he appeared as a guest on I’ve Got a Secret with a music written by his computer: does it make any difference if a robot is capable of creativity/empathy or not, as long as they appear to do so?
These are major paradigms shifts in few decades time, it’s the fastest change we have ever saw in human history, it is not possible for us to conceive this reality if ot thorough play methods.
The Voigt-Kampff test from Philip K. Dick’s book made me think, what if it wasn’t a test but a way to teach the androids on how to react “properly” or according to human criteria to a certain situation, but what if instead it was possible to teach them to acquire these reactions?
Further more, if we would apply “play” to teach androids, very much in a non-formal education framework, would it be possible to create a game on empathy? For the assignment 3 I tried to develop a game that would be applied in the future and teach robots to deal with multiculturalism, with values that they are not programed to deal with, with radically different points of view… This started me reflecting on how such test/game could be used nowadays with humans that are just thinking different (like homophobic people) and through this promoting discrimination. I want to use this teaching androids game that will be used in the future and use it already in the present.